iStock / Thinkstock
ideate witnessing egregious act of brute inhuman treatment , work in dangerous condition or see as human food is made in nasty circumstances and not being able to report your findings for fright of a $ 5,000 Indian file and jail sentence .
An “ ag gag ” vizor visit just that . It ’s one of those laws that makes me think , “ If thing were right with the world in the first place , legislation like this would never even be considered . ” Alas , things are not correct with the world , and ag gag bills — laws that make undercover farm investigation illegal — are a reality .
Six states — Iowa , Kansas , Missouri , Montana , North Dakota and Utah — presently have ag gag legislation . Today ’s word is that Idaho just last week departed from that list because its police force was dominate unconstitutional .
Not Just Animal Rights
Under ag - gag law , undercover investigations by journalists , activists , employee and the public that document animal - eudaimonia , worker - condom and food - safety violations at farming production facilities are nixed . That ’s a ravishment of your First Amendment rights — freedom of voice communication — says B. Lynn Winmill , chief judge of the U.S. District Court for Idaho .
Think about those picture you ’ve seen disseminate the net and those that sometimes make their means to mainstream television that show a sedative moo-cow being push by a forklift or rightfully gross practices at a food - product plant . They spark public outrage , protests against the farm or company , and promise from the farm or company that their protocols have been changed to prevent such unsufferable conduct from happening again . Those are the video that ag - gag bills are designed to prevent being made .
Winmill find another constitutional infraction in the Equal Protection article of the 14th Amendment ( I bet you did n’t even screw there was such a thing ! ) because the bill was introduced with motivation against fauna advocates . The rulingexplains : “ Many legislators [ when crafting this bank bill ] made their design crystallization decipherable by comparing animal right activist to terrorists , persecutor , vigilante , extortioner , and occupy marauders who pullulate into strange territory and destroy crops to thirst foeman into submission . Other legislators accused animal right groups of being extreme activists who project way out solely to add in donations or to purposely defame agricultural facilities .
“ As the Supreme Court has repeatedly said , ‘ a bare congressional desire to harm a politically unpopular group can not plant a lawful governmental pastime if adequate protective cover of the laws is to mean anything . ’ … ”
So it ’s interesting that if Idaho ’s ag - gag bill had been frame in other than by its supporters , it would be slightly more acceptable to the tribunal .
Unpopular Law
Nationwide , 32 ag - gag laws have failed . The lawsuit take exception the Idaho law was file in 2014 by several animal- and human - right chemical group , including the Animal Legal Defense Fund , the American Civil Liberties Union , the Center for Food Safety andPeople for the Ethical Treatment of Animals . They ’ve also had an ag - gag lawsuit pending in Utah since 2013 , and hopes are that now that Idaho ’s jurisprudence has fallen , other states are next to reconsider .
I think what unites hoi polloi in being anti - ag jest is that it ’s not just about the fair intervention of animals at ag readiness , but also the safety and mediocre intervention of citizenry working there and the guard of the food being produced there . For a police to come along and tell us to just hush and assume our ground beef with a side ofE. coliand inhumane treatment is , itself , inhumane .
you could see the full U.S. District Court decisionhere . It ’s worth the read to get a horse sense of the ( what I consider sad ) system of logic used in passing the Idaho billhook in the first place and how the court get at the conclusion to overturn the bill .
« More The News Hog »
